Coalition Formation by Sophisticated Players

Name: Coalition Formation by Sophisticated Players
Brand: Springer Nature
SKU: 9783540092490
Availability: InStock

Best Price:
Buy Coalition Formation by Sophisticated Players for $39.99 at @ Link.springer.com
No coupon is required — this is the standard retail price.

Set a price drop alert to never miss an offer.

1 Offer Price Range: $39.99 - $39.99

BEST PRICE

Single Product Purchase

$39.99

@ Link.springer.com BUY Now

Price Comparison

Seller	Contact Seller	List Price	On Sale	Shipping	Best Promo	Final Price	Volume Discount	Financing	Availability	Seller's Page
BEST PRICE 1 Product Purchase @ Link.springer.com		$39.99	$39.99			$39.99		See Site	In stock	Visit Store

Product Details

Brand

Springer Nature

Manufacturer

N/A

Part Number

GTIN

9783540092490

Condition

New

Product Description

The three major aims of the present study were to (a) test some of the major game-theoretic solutions for n-person games in characteristic function form with data obtained from "rational" players; (b) locate, assess, and explain differences between sophisticated and naive subjects in coalition frequencies and payoff disbursements; and (c) provide a common data base for bargaining process analyses and testing of both present and future models. To this end, five quartets of subjects each partici pated in 16 different coalition formation tasks presented as computer-controlled, four-person, characteristic function games with sidepayments. All 20 subjects (a) were relatively mathematically sophisticated, (b) were familiar with the major solution concepts for characteristic function games, (c) could safely assume that their co-players were equally sophisticated and knowledgeable, and (d) possessed a high motivation to maximize reward. The results showed that (a) sophisticated players are less restricted than naive players in coalition choice, (b) their payoffs are less variable and less ~galitarian, (c) these differences between the two populations of sub jects increase with the complexity of the game, and (d) for III the four-person, mDstly non-superadditive games played in the present experiment, the bargaining set M~i) accounts more accurately for payoff disbursements than do the competitive bargaining set H~i), the kernel K, and Selten's equal share analysis.

Available Colors

N/A

Available Sizes

N/A