Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator:

Name: Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator:
Brand: Springer Nature
SKU: 9780792342465
Availability: InStock

Best Price (Coupon Required):
Buy Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator: for $152.10 at @ Link.springer.com when you apply the 10% OFF coupon at checkout.
Click “Get Coupon & Buy” to copy the code and unlock the deal.

Set a price drop alert to never miss an offer.

1 Offer Price Range: $169.00 - $169.00

BEST PRICE

Single Product Purchase

$152.10

@ Link.springer.com with extra coupon

Price Comparison

Seller	Contact Seller	List Price	On Sale	Shipping	Best Promo	Final Price	Volume Discount	Financing	Availability	Seller's Page
BEST PRICE 1 Product Purchase @ Link.springer.com		$169.00	$169.00		10% OFF This deals requires coupon	$152.10		See Site	In stock	Visit Store

Product Details

Brand

Springer Nature

Manufacturer

N/A

Part Number

GTIN

9780792342465

Condition

New

Product Description

R. G. Collingwood saw one of the main tasks of philosophers and of historians of human thought in uncovering what he called the ultimate presuppositions of different thinkers, of different philosophical movements and of entire eras of intellectual history. He also noted that such ultimate presuppositions usually remain tacit at first, and are discovered only by subsequent reflection. Collingwood would have been delighted by the contrast that constitutes the overall theme of the essays collected in this volume. Not only has this dichotomy ofviews been one ofthe mostcrucial watersheds in the entire twentieth-century philosophical thought. Not only has it remained largely implicit in the writings of the philosophers for whom it mattered most. It is a truly Collingwoodian presupposition also in that it is not apremise assumed by different thinkers in their argumentation. It is the presupposition of a question, an assumption to the effect that a certain general question can be raised and answered. Its role is not belied by the fact that several philosophers who answered it one way or the other seem to be largely unaware that the other answer also makes sense - if it does. This Collingwoodian question can be formulated in a first rough approximation by asking whether language - our actual working language, Tarski's "colloquiallanguage" - is universal in the sense of being inescapable. This formulation needs all sorts of explanations, however.

Available Colors

N/A

Available Sizes

N/A