Advances in Visual Computing
Best Price (Coupon Required):
Buy Advances in Visual Computing for $116.10 at @ Link.springer.com when you apply the 10% OFF coupon at checkout.
Click “Get Coupon & Buy” to copy the code and unlock the deal.
Set a price drop alert to never miss an offer.
Single Product Purchase
Price Comparison
Seller | Contact Seller | List Price | On Sale | Shipping | Best Promo | Final Price | Volume Discount | Financing | Availability | Seller's Page |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEST PRICE 1 Product Purchase
|
|
$129.00 | $129.00 |
|
10% OFF
This deals requires coupon
|
$116.10 | See Site | In stock | Visit Store |
Product Details
It is with greatpleasure that we present the proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Visual Computing (ISVC 2009), which was held in Las Vegas, Nevada. ISVC o?ers a common umbrella for the four main areas of visual c- puting includingvision,graphics,visualization,andvirtualreality.Thegoalisto provide a forum for researchers, scientists, engineers, and practitioners throu- out the world to present their latest research ?ndings, ideas, developments, and applications in the broader area of visual computing. This year, the program consisted of 16 oral sessions, one poster session, 7 special tracks, and 6 keynote presentations. Also, this year ISVC hosted the Third Semantic Robot Vision Challenge.The responseto the call for papers was verygood;wereceivedover320submissionsfor themainsymposiumfromwhich we accepted 97 papers for oral presentation and 63 papers for poster presen- tion. Special track papers were solicited separately through the Organizing and Program Committees of each track. A total of 40 papers were accepted for oral presentation and 15 papers for poster presentation in the special tracks. All papers were reviewed with an emphasis on potential to contribute to the state of the art in the ?eld. Selection criteria included accuracy and originality of ideas, clarity and signi?cance of results, and presentation quality. The review process was quite rigorous, involving two to three independent blind reviews followed by several days of discussion. During the discussion period we tried to correct anomalies and errors that might have existed in the initial reviews.